In the early hours of Saturday morning, UK fans tuned in once more for a rivalry that’s helped define an era. And once again, Katie Taylor and Amanda Serrano didn’t miss.
Taylor edged Serrano via majority decision, making it three wins out of three and seemingly closing the door on what may be the greatest trilogy in women’s boxing history. But let’s be honest — was it really a clean sweep? Because after watching that third fight four times and scoring it four different ways, I can’t argue with the judge who saw it as a draw. That’s how tight this trilogy has been.
So now that the dust’s settled, the big questions remain: Did Serrano deserve one? Is Taylor the greatest of all time? And is a fourth fight really that far-fetched?
Three Fights, Three Epics
The Taylor Serrano trilogy started back in April 2022 at Madison Square Garden — a history-making night for women’s boxing. It was the first time two women headlined at the Garden, and they delivered a ten-round war. Taylor edged it on a split decision in a fight where both had moments of dominance.
Fast forward to November 2024 — Dallas, Texas. This was the one I thought Serrano won. She boxed smart, kept the pressure on, and for long stretches, she looked in control. The judges gave it to Taylor by unanimous decision, but it was far from clear-cut. And I still think Amanda has a right to feel hard done by there.
And now, fight three, back in New York — another war of attrition. Taylor started sharp, Serrano came on strong late, and once again we were left debating the cards. Taylor got the nod, but one judge had it a draw. Watching it back? I couldn’t argue. It was that close.
Did Serrano Deserve a Win?
If we’re being honest — yes, I think she did. At least once.
Whether you lean towards fight two or Saturday’s majority decision, there’s a strong case that Serrano should’ve walked away with one W. She outlanded Taylor in stretches, mixed up her shots brilliantly to head and body, and looked the fresher fighter late in both fights.
Even the judges have reflected that — it’s rare in a 3–0 trilogy for so many cards to be razor-thin. That tells you everything you need to know.
l say this up front: Katie Taylor’s greatness doesn’t rely on a clean sweep over Serrano. Her legacy was already secure.
Two-weight undisputed champion. Olympic gold medallist. Wins over Serrano, Persoon, Cameron, Jonas. No ducking. No easy touches. She’s taken on everyone — and beaten them.
Sky Sports crowned her the face of women’s boxing years ago. Today, I’d go further: she’s the GOAT of this modern generation. Claressa Shields might shout loudest, and her achievements are incredible, but Taylor’s consistency and résumé in a loaded lightweight division give her the edge for me.
Could We See a Fourth?
Now here’s the twist — I know it’s unlikely. Taylor turns 40 next year. Serrano’s 36. They’ve done 30 high-paced rounds already.
But the demand is still there. These fights have been close, compelling, and culturally significant. And I’d argue a fourth — with 12 three-minute rounds, no half measures — would give us a true final chapter.
Would it change history? Maybe not. But it could clarify it. And boxing, as we know, doesn’t always do clarity. That’s why this rivalry matters.
Final Word: Clean Sweep or Too Close to Call?
The Taylor Serrano trilogy might be over — but the debate is far from settled.
Yes, Taylor won all three on paper. But inside those ropes, these were contests of inches, not miles. Serrano has every right to feel she should have taken one, and Taylor proved — again — that no matter how tough it gets, she finds a way to win.
That’s what greatness looks like.
Join the Debate
Did Taylor really win all three? Should Serrano have taken the second? Would you be up for a fourth fight?
Head over to CMBoxing.co.uk and let me know what you think in the comments. Or join the chat on socials — this one’s not done yet.