The highly anticipated rematch between Tyson Fury and Oleksandr Usyk not only delivered a spectacular fight but also introduced a significant innovation to boxing: AI in boxing judging. This new technology, designed to bring greater objectivity and transparency to fight scoring, played a pivotal role in how the bout was viewed and analysed. While traditional judges ultimately decided the winner, the presence of AI offered an intriguing glimpse into the future of the sport.
In this article, we’ll explore how AI in boxing judging was used during the rematch, its potential benefits, the controversies it sparked, and how it could shape the future of boxing.
What is AI in Boxing Judging?
AI in boxing judging uses advanced algorithms to analyse fights in real-time, scoring rounds based on measurable data. These systems process information such as punch accuracy, power, defence, and ring control using multiple camera angles and motion tracking technology. The aim is to provide objective scoring that minimises the subjectivity often associated with human judges.
During the Fury vs Usyk rematch, the AI scoring system worked in parallel with the traditional judges. Its scores were displayed after each round, allowing fans to compare the two systems and see how the AI evaluated the action.
For those curious about the underlying technology, many resources, such as MIT Technology Review, delve into the use of AI in sports analytics and its applications across different disciplines.
How AI Judging Impacted the Fury vs Usyk Rematch
The rematch between Fury and Usyk presented a unique test for AI in boxing judging. With Fury’s aggressive style clashing against Usyk’s technical brilliance, several rounds were incredibly close. The AI system, focused purely on data, often differed from the traditional judges’ scores.
In one controversial round, the AI favoured Fury for landing more powerful punches, while human judges awarded the round to Usyk, emphasising his superior movement and control of the ring. This discrepancy highlighted the divide between algorithmic analysis and human interpretation, sparking lively debates among fans and commentators.
Although the AI’s scores were not used to determine the official result, they significantly influenced the public’s perception of the fight. This raised questions about whether AI could become a standard part of judging in the future.
For more on the fight and its context, check out BBC Sport’s coverage.
Benefits of AI in Boxing Judging
Objectivity and Fairness
AI in boxing judging has the potential to eliminate human bias and errors, which have long plagued the sport. By focusing solely on quantifiable data, it ensures that every punch and movement is evaluated consistently. This could lead to fairer outcomes for fighters and greater trust in the scoring process.
Real-Time Transparency
The use of AI provides fans with real-time insights into the fight, offering a deeper understanding of why a round is scored a certain way. This transparency enhances the viewing experience and allows for a more informed discussion of the action.
Supporting, Not Replacing, Judges
AI is not intended to replace human judges but to complement them. By acting as a second opinion, it adds an extra layer of scrutiny to scoring decisions, making outcomes more robust and less prone to controversy.
Controversies Surrounding AI in Boxing Judging
Over-Simplification of Boxing
One of the main criticisms of AI in boxing judging is that it risks reducing the complexity of the sport to mere statistics. While algorithms can measure punches and movements, they may struggle to capture the nuances of a fighter’s strategy or artistry, such as Usyk’s exceptional footwork.
Trust and Integrity
As with any technology, there are concerns about the potential for manipulation or errors in AI systems. Ensuring the integrity of these systems will be crucial to their adoption in professional boxing.
Resistance from Traditionalists
Many boxing purists view AI as an unnecessary intrusion into a sport steeped in tradition. Striking a balance between innovation and heritage will be essential for AI to gain widespread acceptance.
The Future of AI in Boxing Judging
The use of AI in boxing judging during the Fury vs Usyk rematch was a bold step forward, but it is just the beginning. As the technology evolves, it could become a standard feature in professional boxing, especially for high-profile fights.
However, the sport must address key concerns to ensure AI enhances the integrity of boxing rather than detracting from it. Finding ways to balance data-driven analysis with the human touch will be critical in shaping its role in the sport’s future.
Stay Ahead in Boxing
If you’re passionate about boxing and want to keep up with the latest innovations and insights, visit CMBoxing. From AI in boxing judging to the latest fight news, we’ve got you covered.
Boxing is evolving—don’t miss your chance to stay in the loop.